Applies to a parent or guardian whose child under 18 has been detained by the police or accused of an offence. A child is dealt with through the Juvenile Justice Board, a process distinct from an adult criminal court, with specific procedural protections, though a narrow exception allows a 16-18 year old accused of a serious offence to eventually be tried as an adult after a formal assessment.
National Commission for Protection of Child Rights: https://ncpcr.gov.in
Helpline: 1098 (CHILDLINE, 24x7 child helpline)
Handled by: Child Welfare Police Officer -> Juvenile Justice Board -> Children's Court
Who can use this: A parent, guardian, or family member of a child under 18 who has been apprehended, detained, or accused of an offence by the police.
This does not cover: This does not cover a child who needs care and protection rather than being accused of an offence (a separate process before the Child Welfare Committee applies there). It also does not cover offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 committed against a child, which is a different situation involving the child as a victim rather than as an accused.
Time limit: A child alleged to be in conflict with law must be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board within 24 hours of being taken into custody, excluding travel time; the child cannot be kept in a police lock-up or ordinary jail while this is arranged. (Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, s.10)
Cost: Free (no fee applies to production before the Board or the bail process)
What happens after: The child is produced before the Juvenile Justice Board, which considers bail; if the child is not released, they are kept in an observation home rather than a jail. For an alleged heinous offence by a 16-18 year old, the Board conducts a preliminary assessment before deciding whether to retain the matter itself or transfer it for trial before the Children's Court.
These are the remedies Indian law provides for this kind of situation -- not a recommendation, and not every remedy will apply to your own facts.
It is a specialised body, generally comprising a Magistrate and two social workers (at least one of whom must be a woman), set up specifically to deal with children alleged to be in conflict with law, following a more child-friendly procedure than an ordinary criminal court.
No, a child in conflict with law is not to be handcuffed, chained, or kept in a police lock-up or ordinary jail.
Within 24 hours of being taken into custody, excluding the time needed to travel from the place of apprehension to the Board, under s.10 of the Act.
Bail is the general rule under s.12 of the Act, regardless of whether the offence is bailable or non-bailable, but it can be refused on three specific grounds: likely association with a known criminal, exposure to moral, physical, or psychological danger, or a real risk that release would defeat the ends of justice.
Under s.2(33), it is an offence for which the minimum punishment prescribed by law is imprisonment for seven years or more.
No. Only where a heinous offence is alleged does the Board conduct a mandatory preliminary assessment under s.15, examining the child's mental and physical capacity, ability to understand consequences, and the circumstances of the alleged offence, before deciding whether the case proceeds before the Board or is transferred to the Children's Court.
In an observation home established under s.47 of the Act, meant for temporary reception, care, and rehabilitation during the pendency of an inquiry -- not in an adult jail or lock-up.
Yes, under s.101, any person aggrieved by an order of the Board may generally appeal to the Children's Court within thirty days.
The Supreme Court has resolved this. In Child in Conflict with Law (Through His Mother) v. State of Karnataka, 2024 INSC 387, the Court held that 'Children's Court' and 'Court of Session' under the Act are to be read interchangeably: jurisdiction primarily vests in the Children's Court, but where no Children's Court has been constituted in a district, the Court of Session exercises that power instead. The Court also clarified that the thirty-day appeal period under s.101(2) can be extended for sufficient cause shown, since the Act itself is silent on that point.
An officer designated at each police station, not below a specified rank, who deals specifically with matters concerning children, in coordination with the Juvenile Justice Board and relevant welfare organisations.
Yes, a person's age at the time of the alleged offence is central to whether the Juvenile Justice Act applies at all, and courts and the Board rely on documents such as a birth certificate or school records to determine it.
Governing law: Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
Source: Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, ss.2(33), 10, 12, 15, 47, 101. The bare text of s.101(2) points to the Court of Session for an appeal against a preliminary-assessment order, but the Supreme Court in Child in Conflict with Law (Through His Mother) v. State of Karnataka, 2024 INSC 387 resolved this: 'Children's Court' and 'Court of Session' are to be read interchangeably, with jurisdiction primarily vesting in the Children's Court where one has been constituted.
Aadhrix does not decide which route applies to you. This describes the official process as published — consider an advocate for advice specific to your situation.
Dealing with this yourself?
Track it in your own Aadhrix -- keep the documents, dates, and follow-ups together in one place, free.
Track this in your own Aadhrix