Applies when a bank or NBFC has issued, or threatens to issue, a notice under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 against a home, shop or other mortgaged property over a defaulted secured loan. The Act gives the borrower defined windows to repay, object, and approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal before possession or auction can proceed.
Debts Recovery Tribunal / DRAT e-Tribunals portal: https://drt.etribunals.gov.in
Handled by: Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT)
Who can use this: A borrower, co-borrower, guarantor, or any other person aggrieved by a bank or NBFC's SARFAESI enforcement action against a mortgaged property
This does not cover: This does not cover an unsecured personal loan or credit card debt with no mortgaged security -- SARFAESI applies only where a specific asset has been given as security for the loan. It also does not apply to security interests below Rs 1 lakh, dues below 20% of the principal and interest, or property genuinely used for agriculture at the time the security was created.
Time limit: 60 days to repay after the Section 13(2) notice; a Section 17 application to the DRT is generally due within 45 days of the Section 13(4) enforcement measure; a Section 18 appeal to the DRAT is due within 30 days of the DRT's order. (Sections 13(2), 17 and 18, SARFAESI Act, 2002)
Cost: A Section 17 DRT application carries a modest court fee (commonly cited as around Rs 200); a DRAT appeal requires the 50% pre-deposit described above.
What happens after: If the DRT sets aside the secured creditor's action, the enforcement measure is undone. If the DRT upholds the action and no appeal succeeds, the secured creditor may proceed to sell/auction the property to recover the dues, with any surplus after the debt and costs returned to the borrower.
These are the remedies Indian law provides for this kind of situation -- not a recommendation, and not every remedy will apply to your own facts.
A minimum of 60 days from the date of the Section 13(2) demand notice, during which the borrower must be given the opportunity to repay the outstanding dues in full.
Yes -- Section 13(3-A) allows the borrower to raise a representation or objection within the 60-day period, and the secured creditor must respond in writing with reasons within 15 days.
The secured creditor may then take enforcement measures under Section 13(4) -- such as taking possession of the property or taking over its management -- without needing to approach a court first.
Yes -- an application can be filed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17, generally within 45 days of the Section 13(4) measure, and no pre-deposit is required to file it.
Filing the initial Section 17 application before the DRT does not require a pre-deposit, though a modest court fee applies; it is the further appeal to the DRAT under Section 18 that requires the mandatory pre-deposit.
50% of the debt due as claimed by the secured creditor or as determined by the DRT, whichever is less -- the DRAT may reduce this to not less than 25% for recorded reasons, but cannot waive it entirely.
Section 31 excludes property actually used for agriculture at the time the security interest was created -- but the Supreme Court has held that merely showing the land as agricultural in revenue records is not enough; actual use must be shown.
No -- the Act does not apply where the secured financial asset does not exceed Rs 1 lakh, or where the amount due is less than 20% of the principal and interest.
No -- the bank must first take a formal enforcement measure under Section 13(4), such as taking possession, and a sale typically follows a separate sale notice, which itself opens a fresh window to approach the DRT.
No -- SARFAESI applies only where a specific asset has been given as security for the loan; an unsecured debt has no 'secured asset' for the bank to take possession of under this Act.
After the secured creditor recovers the dues and costs of the sale, any surplus amount is required to be returned to the borrower.
Governing law: Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002
Source: Sections 13(2), 13(3-A), 13(4), 17, 18 and 31, SARFAESI Act, 2002; Mardia Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India, (2004) 4 SCC 311. The exact court fee for a Section 17 DRT application varies and could not be confirmed with certainty from a single authoritative source.
Aadhrix does not decide which route applies to you. This describes the official process as published — consider an advocate for advice specific to your situation.
Dealing with this yourself?
Track it in your own Aadhrix -- keep the documents, dates, and follow-ups together in one place, free.
Track this in your own Aadhrix